lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:08:49 -0500
From:	Zachary Mark <zmark@...versafe.com>
To:	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Discrepancy in 'df' output between kernel 3.0 and 3.2 for ext4?

Ext4 developers,

I recently upgraded my kernel from 3.0.24 to 3.2.18, and discovered that 
df is now reporting different statistics for my ext4 file systems (sda1 
is ext3 and unaffected).  Notice the difference between the 1K-blocks 
column and Used column between kernel versions (Available remains 
constant, as it is merely Used subtracted from the total size):

3.0.24:
[root@box ~]# df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1              5080796    951932   3866608  20% /
tmpfs                 12368192        32  12368160   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sdb1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/9c2fb7c6-31db-4e29-b1b4-c199261301f9
/dev/sdc1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/a564e4e1-9b49-40f0-afbd-e0ec4789da70
/dev/sdd1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/f628cda4-ed56-4b8d-be1e-133917569b47
/dev/sde1            2907178636    359512 2906819124   1% 
/media/648da0a1-3b1b-42f7-a032-d592bb1435e2
/dev/sdf1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/ce380174-701c-43e8-8986-256d23c3cbd2
/dev/sdg1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/a61227f7-ec93-43ba-b657-6c95b81e51e7
/dev/sdh1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/62b23b60-b70d-4097-ba35-0ffa57de8a44
/dev/sdi1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/479bcb00-f4b0-41e5-9a06-56f02259912c
/dev/sdj1            2907178636    359512 2906819124   1% 
/media/0ccf9659-15d1-4e2b-81c7-b3d1fbb61076
/dev/sdk1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/096c90c5-b28f-409a-9f5b-8ae09569ecb0
/dev/sdl1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/671e195b-2e10-4d2d-83cf-96fd07daf3da
/dev/sdm1            2907178636    205876 2906972760   1% 
/media/0ec3c3ed-374f-4d52-9ccf-f8a42fb246c5


3.2.18:
[root@box ~]# df
Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1              5080796    953576   3864964  20% /
tmpfs                 12368792        32  12368760   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sdb1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/9c2fb7c6-31db-4e29-b1b4-c199261301f9
/dev/sdc1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/a564e4e1-9b49-40f0-afbd-e0ec4789da70
/dev/sdd1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/f628cda4-ed56-4b8d-be1e-133917569b47
/dev/sde1            2928918024  22098900 2906819124   1% 
/media/648da0a1-3b1b-42f7-a032-d592bb1435e2
/dev/sdf1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/ce380174-701c-43e8-8986-256d23c3cbd2
/dev/sdg1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/a61227f7-ec93-43ba-b657-6c95b81e51e7
/dev/sdh1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/62b23b60-b70d-4097-ba35-0ffa57de8a44
/dev/sdi1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/479bcb00-f4b0-41e5-9a06-56f02259912c
/dev/sdj1            2928918024  22098900 2906819124   1% 
/media/0ccf9659-15d1-4e2b-81c7-b3d1fbb61076
/dev/sdk1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/096c90c5-b28f-409a-9f5b-8ae09569ecb0
/dev/sdl1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/671e195b-2e10-4d2d-83cf-96fd07daf3da
/dev/sdm1            2928918024  21945264 2906972760   1% 
/media/0ec3c3ed-374f-4d52-9ccf-f8a42fb246c5

I bisected the change to the following commit:

f975d6bcc7a698a10cc755115e27d3612dcfe322 is the first bad commit
commit f975d6bcc7a698a10cc755115e27d3612dcfe322
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date:   Fri Sep 9 19:00:51 2011 -0400

     ext4: teach ext4_statfs() to deal with clusters if bigalloc is enabled

     Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>

Reverting this commit on top of 3.2.18 returns the output to pre-3.2 
levels.

Here's my /proc/mounts:

[root@box ~]# cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / ext3 
rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev /dev tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0
/proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
/sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,relatime 0 0
/dev/sdb1 /media/9c2fb7c6-31db-4e29-b1b4-c199261301f9 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdc1 /media/a564e4e1-9b49-40f0-afbd-e0ec4789da70 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdd1 /media/f628cda4-ed56-4b8d-be1e-133917569b47 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sde1 /media/648da0a1-3b1b-42f7-a032-d592bb1435e2 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdf1 /media/ce380174-701c-43e8-8986-256d23c3cbd2 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdg1 /media/a61227f7-ec93-43ba-b657-6c95b81e51e7 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdh1 /media/62b23b60-b70d-4097-ba35-0ffa57de8a44 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdi1 /media/479bcb00-f4b0-41e5-9a06-56f02259912c ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdj1 /media/0ccf9659-15d1-4e2b-81c7-b3d1fbb61076 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdk1 /media/096c90c5-b28f-409a-9f5b-8ae09569ecb0 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdl1 /media/671e195b-2e10-4d2d-83cf-96fd07daf3da ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sdm1 /media/0ec3c3ed-374f-4d52-9ccf-f8a42fb246c5 ext4 
rw,noatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0

Is this discrepancy between the df outputs on the two kernel versions 
expected given my mount options?  I decided to come to the list because 
I don't have the technical depth with regard to ext4 to be able to 
analyze the ext4_statfs changes that went into making bigalloc work, and 
I haven't found any reports of similar symptoms via web searches or the 
Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt.  This is not a production machine, 
so I am free to make any alterations or patches needed (if such a thing 
is required).  Let me know if there is anything additional I need to 
provide.

Also, I'm not subscribed to the list, so please cc-me directly on any 
replies.

Thank you in advance,

Zachary Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ