lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:15:56 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS > version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). Hi Mark, Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of the ones in the kernel.org tree)? I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed on that point? Thanks, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists