linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 10/11] ext4: punch_hole should wait for DIO writers V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:46:46 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz,
	lczerner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] ext4: punch_hole should wait for DIO writers V2

On Fri 28-09-12 19:44:10, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> punch_hole is the place where we have to wait for all existing writers
> (writeback, aio, dio), but currently we simply flush pended end_io request
> which is not sufficient. Other issue is that punch_hole performed w/o i_mutex
> held which obviously result in dangerous data corruption due to
> write-after-free.
> 
> This patch performs following changes:
> - Guard punch_hole with i_mutex
> - Recheck inode flags under i_mutex
> - Block all new dio readers in order to prevent information leak caused by
>   read-after-free pattern.
> - punch_hole now wait for all writers in flight
>   NOTE: XXX write-after-free race is still possible because new dirty pages
>   may appear due to mmap(), and currently there is no easy way to stop
>   writeback while punch_hole is in progress.
  The patch looks good. Just one nit: The label 'out' in
ext4_ext_punch_hole() is now named contrary to common scheme where 'out' is
the outermost of labels. So renaming that to something like 'out_orphan'
would be good. Besides this you can add:
  Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> 
> Changes from V1:
>   Add flag checks once we hold i_mutex
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/extents.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 70ba122..a1d16eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -4568,9 +4568,29 @@ int ext4_ext_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
>  	loff_t first_page_offset, last_page_offset;
>  	int credits, err = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions
> +	 * Then release them.
> +	 */
> +	if (mapping->nrpages && mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
> +		err = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping,
> +			offset, offset + length - 1);
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +	/* Need recheck file flags under mutex */
> +	/* It's not possible punch hole on append only file */
> +	if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	if (IS_SWAPFILE(inode))
> +		return -ETXTBSY;
> +
>  	/* No need to punch hole beyond i_size */
>  	if (offset >= inode->i_size)
> -		return 0;
> +		goto out_mutex;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If the hole extends beyond i_size, set the hole
> @@ -4588,33 +4608,25 @@ int ext4_ext_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
>  	first_page_offset = first_page << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  	last_page_offset = last_page << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Write out all dirty pages to avoid race conditions
> -	 * Then release them.
> -	 */
> -	if (mapping->nrpages && mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
> -		err = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping,
> -			offset, offset + length - 1);
> -
> -		if (err)
> -			return err;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Now release the pages */
>  	if (last_page_offset > first_page_offset) {
>  		truncate_pagecache_range(inode, first_page_offset,
>  					 last_page_offset - 1);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* finish any pending end_io work */
> +	/* Wait all existing dio workers, newcomers will block on i_mutex */
> +	ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode);
> +	inode_dio_wait(inode);
>  	err = ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
>  	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		goto out_dio;
>  
>  	credits = ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode);
>  	handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, credits);
> -	if (IS_ERR(handle))
> -		return PTR_ERR(handle);
> +	if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(handle);
> +		goto out_dio;
> +	}
>  
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -4706,6 +4718,10 @@ out:
>  	inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
>  	ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
>  	ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> +out_dio:
> +	ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
> +out_mutex:
> +	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>  	return err;
>  }
>  int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html