[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:02:52 -0400
From: Andrey Sidorov <qrxd43@...orola.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A warning from 3.6+ with bigalloc and delalloc when running xfstest
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> It is indeed, something we need to fix, and it's part of the problem
> where where the delayed allocation for bigalloc is completely screwed
> up. Part of the problem is when we write into a cluster which has not
> yet been mapped in the extent tree, but which might (or might not)
> have had other blocks in the cluster that have already been subject to
> delayed allocation, we don't know whether to reserve clusters for the
> purposes of doing the the delayed allocation accounting. Fixing this
> w/o the extent status tree means having to search the page cache and
> for other pages in the cluster, which is not only painful, but tricky
> from the perspective of lock ordering.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't notice this problem originally because I
> hadn't been doing regular xfstests runs with bigalloc, and most of my
> testing had been with direct I/O, where these issues didn't come up.
>
> - Ted
Hi Ted,
Does it mean I'd better turn off delalloc if I use bigalloc with linux 3.5.3?
Regards,
Andrey.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists