linux-ext4 - Re: How to use new "native 4k sector sized" HDD with ext4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:36:54 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC:	Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>, adilger@...ger.ca,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to use new "native 4k sector sized" HDD with ext4

On 10/30/12 9:22 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:27:52PM +0530, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
>>
>> In mkfs.xfs there is option "-s", using which, one can set the sector size.
>> What is the use case of this option?
>>
>> Also, such option is not present for ext4. So, apart from aligining the
>>  partition on multiple of 8 sector numbers do we have to do something else
>>  for using 4k sectors?
> 
> The equivalent option for ext4 is -b (which we call the block size).
> It defaults to 4k for all but the very smallest file systems, where
> space efficiency (especially if you are storing a large number of
> small files on say, a 1.44 megabyte floppy) becomes more important.
> For file system smaller than 512mb, we use the smallest possible block
> size supported by ext2/3/4, which is 1k.  (This is configurable; see
> /etc/mke2fs.conf; "small" file systems are ones smaller than 512mb,
> while "floppy" file systems are ones smaller than 4mb.  You can change
> the defaults in the configuration file, or you can specify explicit
> settings via the command-line options as documented in the mke2fs man
> page.

One thing I noticed is that if mkfs.ext4 self-selects a block size based
on device size, it ignores the physical block size and does not warn
about it:

# mkfs.ext4 /dev/sde
mke2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=1024 (log=0)
...

For tiny filesystems, performance is probably not a big deal though.

>> Is there any way to make sure that ext4 is indeed using 4k sectors?
> 
> You can use dumpe2fs to look at the file system parameters.  The
> confusion here is caused by the fact that xfs uses sector size where
> ext 2/3/4 follows the BSD Fast File System convention of using the
> terminology of "block size".

Well, xfs uses both, actually.

       -b block_size_options
              This option  specifies  the  fundamental  block  size
              of the filesystem. 

       -s sector_size
              This  option  specifies  the  fundamental sector size
              of the filesystem. 

but the man page doesn't do a great job of describing when one or
the other comes into play.

> XFS supports using the minimum sector size of 512 bytes by default
> since it means that if you are store large number of small files
> (i.e., only one or two 512 byte sectors), there is less wasted space.

The bigger issue here is on XFS is that even for a 4k block size fs,
XFS will issue some 512 IOs.  That's why there's a separate switch
and separate heuristics for bumping it up on 4k devices - separate
from the block size itself.

-Eric 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html