lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	1 Jan 2013 15:10:12 -0500
From:	"George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To:	gnehzuil.liu@...il.com, tytso@....edu
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux@...izon.com
Subject: Re: debugfs: dump a sparse file as a new sparse file

Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:46:13AM -0000, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> --- a/debugfs/dump.c
>> +++ b/debugfs/dump.c
>> @@ -105,10 +105,11 @@ static void dump_file(const char *cmdname, ext2_ino_t ino, int fd,
>>  {
>>  	errcode_t retval;
>>  	struct ext2_inode	inode;
>> -	char 		buf[8192];
>> +	char 		buf[current_fs->blocksize];

> Note: this is a non-standard/non-portable GCC extension.  The best way
> to fix this is to explicitly malloc the buffer and then free it before
> dump_file exits.

Er... isn't that also in C99?  That should be portable enough.
Is there an actual compiler of interest that doesn't support it?

Here's a set of C99 conformance tests:
http://p99.gforge.inria.fr/c99-conformance/

Gcc, clang, icc, opencc and pcc all support VLAs.
Only tcc lacks support.  Is tcc support an important goal?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists