linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Ext2: use unlikely to improve the efficiency of the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:21:32 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	shilong wang <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Ext2: use unlikely to improve the efficiency of
 the kernel

On Sat 12-01-13 01:34:50, shilong wang wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> Because the function 'sb_getblk' seldomly fails to return
> NULL value. It will be better to use unlikely to optimize it.
  Thanks, I've merged the patch. But your mailer has apparently wrapped
lines in the patch so I had to fix it up. Please either use mailer that
doesn't wrap lines or send patches as text/plain attachments. Thanks!

								Honza
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext2/super.c |    2 +-
>  fs/ext2/xattr.c |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index af74d9e..c0f4fc6 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static ssize_t ext2_quota_write(struct
> super_block *sb, int type,
>  			bh = sb_bread(sb, tmp_bh.b_blocknr);
>  		else
>  			bh = sb_getblk(sb, tmp_bh.b_blocknr);
> -		if (!bh) {
> +		if (unlikely(!bh)) {
>  			err = -EIO;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/xattr.c b/fs/ext2/xattr.c
> index b6754db..06209ec 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/xattr.c
> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ ext2_xattr_set2(struct inode *inode, struct
> buffer_head *old_bh,
>  			ea_idebug(inode, "creating block %d", block);
> 
>  			new_bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
> -			if (!new_bh) {
> +			if (unlikely(!new_bh)) {
>  				ext2_free_blocks(inode, block, 1);
>  				mark_inode_dirty(inode);
>  				error = -EIO;
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html