linux-ext4 - Re: ext4 xfstests results for 3.8 on Pandaboard ES (ARM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:35:52 -0500
From:	Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
To:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: ext4 xfstests results for 3.8 on Pandaboard ES (ARM)

* Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>:

<snip>

> > BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21
> > 15:41:27 EST 2013
> > Ran: 001 002 005 006 007 011 013 014 015 020 053 062 068 069 070 074 075 076
> >  077 079 083 088 089 091 100 105 112 113 117 120 123 124 125 126 127 128 129
> >  130 131 132 133 135 141 169 184 192 193 198 204 207 208 209 210 211 212 215
> >  219 221 224 225 226 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 239 240 245 246 247 248
> >  249 257 258 263 269 270 271 272 273 275 277 280 285 289 294
> > Failures: 125 285
> > END TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21
> >  17:24:32 EST 2013
> > 
> > Xfstest 285 fails reliably for me on both ARM and x86-64 and only in this test
> > scenario.  I see the same failure on 3.7, so it's not a regression (however,
> > this failure doesn't appear in Ted's early 3.8-rc results).
> > 
> >     --- 285.out	2013-02-19 15:58:25.110665500 -0500
> >     +++ 285.out.bad	2013-02-21 17:23:45.156519882 -0500
> >     @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> >      QA output created by 285
> >     +seek sanity check failed!
> 
> This test case is used to test seek data/hole feature.  After 3.8 ext4
> has supported it.  But it will fail without extents feature because
> indirect-based file haven't unwritten extent.  Please check 285.full
> file, and you will see that test07 fails.
> 
> BTW, I am trying to fix this problem for xfstests.
> 
> Regards,
> 						- Zheng
> 

Hi Zheng:

Thanks very much for your explanation and reminder - it is indeed test07 that
fails.  I'm looking forward to testing your fix when it's ready.

Regards,
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html