linux-ext4 - Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:46:06 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Rich Johnston <rjohnston@....com>
Cc:	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:23:07AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> All xfstest developers,
> 
> Thanks again for all your time in submitting and reviewing patches
> for xfstests.  The latest patchset posted here:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00467.html
> 
> requires all current patches to be re-factored.

Given that we are now segregating patches into subdirectories, is it
correct in the future tests should be named descriptively, instead of
using 3 digit NNN numbers (which has been a major pain from a central
assignment perspective)?

If so, is there a suggested naming convention that is being recommended?

Thanks for getting this change merged in!!

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html