| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:25:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> cc: Li Zhong <lizhongfs@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix group number calculation On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 23:11:47 -0400 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> > To: Li Zhong <lizhongfs@...il.com> > Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, > Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Fix group number calculation > > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:29:48PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote: > > > > It seems that it is caused by different group numbers calculated from > > ext4_get_group_number() and ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(). > > > > The fix below tries to make ext4_get_group_number() consistent with > > ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(): > > 1) minus first data block number instead of adding it > > 2) remove the cluster bits, as seems it is used for offset calculation in > > ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(). > > Thanks for reporting the problem, but only (1) is a problem. The > cluster bits part is right, although it wasn't actually ever going to > be used because we were only setting STD_GROUP_SIZE for non-bigalloc > file systems. The following is I believe the correct fix. > > - Ted > > From 96eaeed0d7fc516481ed07739826dac840755eb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 23:11:16 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_get_group_number() > > The function ext4_get_group_number() was introduced as an optimization > in commit bd86298e60b8. Unfortunately, this commit incorrectly > calculate the group number for file systems with a 1k block size (when > s_first_data_block is 1 instead of zero). This could cause the > following kernel BUG: Yes this is a correct fix, thanks! Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > > [ 568.877799] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 568.877833] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3728! > [ 568.877840] Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1] > [ 568.877845] SMP NR_CPUS=32 NUMA pSeries > [ 568.877852] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc > [ 568.877861] CPU: 1 PID: 3516 Comm: fs_mark Not tainted 3.10.0-03216-g7c6809f-dirty #1 > [ 568.877867] task: c0000001fb0b8000 ti: c0000001fa954000 task.ti: c0000001fa954000 > [ 568.877873] NIP: c0000000002f42a4 LR: c0000000002f4274 CTR: c000000000317ef8 > [ 568.877879] REGS: c0000001fa956ed0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (3.10.0-03216-g7c6809f-dirty) > [ 568.877884] MSR: 8000000000029032 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 24000428 XER: 00000000 > [ 568.877902] SOFTE: 1 > [ 568.877905] CFAR: c0000000002b5464 > [ 568.877908] > GPR00: 0000000000000001 c0000001fa957150 c000000000c6a408 c0000001fb588000 > GPR04: 0000000000003fff c0000001fa9571c0 c0000001fa9571c4 000138098c50625f > GPR08: 1301200000000000 0000000000000002 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > GPR12: 0000000024000422 c00000000f33a300 0000000000008000 c0000001fa9577f0 > GPR16: c0000001fb7d0100 c000000000c29190 c0000000007f46e8 c000000000a14672 > GPR20: 0000000000000001 0000000000000008 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 > GPR24: 0000000000000100 c0000001fa957278 c0000001fdb2bc78 c0000001fa957288 > GPR28: 0000000000100100 c0000001fa957288 c0000001fb588000 c0000001fdb2bd10 > [ 568.877993] NIP [c0000000002f42a4] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xec/0x1c0 > [ 568.877999] LR [c0000000002f4274] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xbc/0x1c0 > [ 568.878004] Call Trace: > [ 568.878008] [c0000001fa957150] [c0000000002f4274] .ext4_mb_release_group_pa+0xbc/0x1c0 (unreliable) > [ 568.878017] [c0000001fa957200] [c0000000002fb070] .ext4_mb_discard_lg_preallocations+0x394/0x444 > [ 568.878025] [c0000001fa957340] [c0000000002fb45c] .ext4_mb_release_context+0x33c/0x734 > [ 568.878032] [c0000001fa957440] [c0000000002fbcf8] .ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x4a4/0x5f4 > [ 568.878039] [c0000001fa957510] [c0000000002ef56c] .ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xc28/0x1178 > [ 568.878047] [c0000001fa957640] [c0000000002c1a94] .ext4_map_blocks+0x2c8/0x490 > [ 568.878054] [c0000001fa957730] [c0000000002c536c] .ext4_writepages+0x738/0xc60 > [ 568.878062] [c0000001fa957950] [c000000000168a78] .do_writepages+0x5c/0x80 > [ 568.878069] [c0000001fa9579d0] [c00000000015d1c4] .__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x88/0xb0 > [ 568.878078] [c0000001fa957aa0] [c00000000015d23c] .filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x50/0xfc > [ 568.878085] [c0000001fa957b30] [c0000000002b8edc] .ext4_sync_file+0x220/0x3c4 > [ 568.878092] [c0000001fa957be0] [c0000000001f849c] .vfs_fsync_range+0x64/0x80 > [ 568.878098] [c0000001fa957c70] [c0000000001f84f0] .vfs_fsync+0x38/0x4c > [ 568.878105] [c0000001fa957d00] [c0000000001f87f4] .do_fsync+0x54/0x90 > [ 568.878111] [c0000001fa957db0] [c0000000001f8894] .SyS_fsync+0x28/0x3c > [ 568.878120] [c0000001fa957e30] [c000000000009c88] syscall_exit+0x0/0x7c > [ 568.878125] Instruction dump: > [ 568.878130] 60000000 813d0034 81610070 38000000 7f8b4800 419e001c 813f007c 7d2bfe70 > [ 568.878144] 7d604a78 7c005850 54000ffe 7c0007b4 <0b000000> e8a10076 e87f0090 7fa4eb78 > [ 568.878160] ---[ end trace 594d911d9654770b ]--- > > In addition fix the STD_GROUP optimization so that it works for > bigalloc file systems as well. > > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> > Reported-by: Li Zhong <lizhongfs@...il.com> > Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.10 > --- > fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c > index 5833939..ddd715e 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c > @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ ext4_group_t ext4_get_group_number(struct super_block *sb, > ext4_group_t group; > > if (test_opt2(sb, STD_GROUP_SIZE)) > - group = (le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block) + > - block) >> > + group = (block - > + le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block)) >> > (EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS(sb) + EXT4_CLUSTER_BITS(sb) + 3); > else > ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, block, &group, NULL); > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c > index 85b3dd6..8862d4d 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c > @@ -3624,10 +3624,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > sbi->s_addr_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(sb)); > sbi->s_desc_per_block_bits = ilog2(EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb)); > > - /* Do we have standard group size of blocksize * 8 blocks ? */ > - if (sbi->s_blocks_per_group == blocksize << 3) > - set_opt2(sb, STD_GROUP_SIZE); > - > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > sbi->s_hash_seed[i] = le32_to_cpu(es->s_hash_seed[i]); > sbi->s_def_hash_version = es->s_def_hash_version; > @@ -3697,6 +3693,10 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > goto failed_mount; > } > > + /* Do we have standard group size of clustersize * 8 blocks ? */ > + if (sbi->s_blocks_per_group == clustersize << 3) > + set_opt2(sb, STD_GROUP_SIZE); > + > /* > * Test whether we have more sectors than will fit in sector_t, > * and whether the max offset is addressable by the page cache. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists