linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 03/22] libext2fs: add functions to operate on extended attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:41:20 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/22] libext2fs: add functions to operate on extended
 attribute

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:55:26PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:34AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > > > +ec	EXT2_ET_EXT_ATTR_CURRUPTED,
> > > > +	"Extended attribute currupted"
> > > 
> > > "corrupted".
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing it out.  Fix it in next spin.
> > 
> > > (Or maybe shorten that to "corrupt"?)
> > 
> > I find the 'CORRUPT' in lib/ext2fs/ext2_err.et.in, and the result are as
> > below.
> > 
> > It seems that there is no any rule about this.  I am wondering if we
> > need to rename _DIR_CORRUPTED to _DIR_CORRUPT.  I am ok for using
> > _CORRUPT or _CORRUPTED.
> 
> We shouldn't change existing error codes since that will break
> backwards compatibility.  My preference for the new error code is:
> 
> ec	  EXT2_ET_EXT_ATTR_CORRUPT,
> 	  "Corrupt Extended attribute"

Got it.

Thanks,
                                                - Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html