Date:	Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:37:14 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] e2fsprogs patchbomb 10/2013

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:13:43AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:13:57PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > 
> > > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:48:54 -0700
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> > > To: tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com
> > > Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 00/25] e2fsprogs patchbomb 10/2013
> > 
> > I was going to review this, but could you please include the
> > information what changed since the last version of each patch (into
> > the patch itself) since it'll make the review much easier.
> 
> I'm working on providing diffs against last time. :)

Ok, I've sent out emails about what's changed since last time.

Patches 1, 3-8, 15, 17-22, and 25 are new.

Patches 2, 9, 10-11, 16, and 23-24 have changes, as noted separately.

Patches 12-14 are unchanged.

--D
> 
> --D
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > -Lukas
> > 
> > > 
> > > Well, here we go again.  This is the same patchbomb from a couple of
> > > weeks ago, minus the patches that Ted has already accepted, plus
> > > several fixes to resize2fs that weren't ready back then, and a few
> > > other fixes that migrated into the other patches.  This series is
> > > against -next.
> > > 
> > > Ted, since you've accepted patches into -pu, do you want me to send
> > > patches against -pu as well?  Or put more bluntly, what are your
> > > thoughts about revert-and-replace of patches in -pu?  Patches 2, 6,
> > > 11, 23, and 24 have changed significantly since 9/30.
> > > 
> > > The first eight patches fix miscellaneous errors: #1 stops dirent
> > > iteration after we successfully link an inode into a directory.  #2
> > > fixes a bug that prohibited us from specifyinng a 64bit superblock
> > > number when opening an FS.  #3 prohibits running mke2fs with -E
> > > resize= and meta_bg.  #4 causes users of the badblocks code to reject
> > > 64bit block numbers.  #5 fixes shift overflows errors when punching
> > > the end of non-extent files.  #6 refactors all the tests for whether
> > > or not we need to set the LARGE_FILE feature (because someone goofed
> > > earlier).  #7 fixes a problem wherein mkfs ignored non-4096 blocksize
> > > directives in the config file on a device larger than 2^32KB.  #8
> > > cleans up some code in debugfs.
> > > 
> > > The next two patches fix some 64bit truncation bugs.
> > > 
> > > Regarding next five patches, I turned on bigalloc and found a number
> > > of bugs relating to the fact that block_alloc_stats2() takes a block
> > > number but operates on clusters.  I've fixed up all the allocation
> > > errors that I found.  I also decided to make the quota code use
> > > ext2fs_punch rather than try to correct its behavior wrt bigalloc.
> > > There was also a bug wherein the requirement that 64-bit bitmaps be
> > > enabled (via EXT2_FLAG_64BITS) for bigalloc filesystems.  There's also
> > > a patch to reduce the e2fsck output verbosity when there are block
> > > bitmap errors.  Note that #11 has been refactored significantly.
> > > 
> > > The next patch provides the ability to toggle the 64bit feature on any
> > > ext4 filesystem.
> > > 
> > > The four patches after that fix various resize2fs bugs with bigalloc.
> > > 
> > > The next two patches fix bugs with metadata_csum.  There's a patch to
> > > fix up some code to test if checksums are enabled instead of a
> > > GDT_CSUM open-code.  Finally, there's a patch to resize2fs to rewrite
> > > checksums of inodes that were relocated.
> > > 
> > > The next two patches add the ability to edit extended attributes and
> > > add a fuse2fs driver for e2fsprogs.  I admit that the xattr editing
> > > functions clash with the inline_data patches, though sadly, the inline
> > > data patches don't provide an API to access EAs in a separate EA
> > > block.  The fuse driver should work with the latest versions of Linux
> > > fuse (2.9.2) and osxfuse (2.6.1).  I've been using the fuse driver to
> > > test e2fsprogs functionality, which is how I came across most of the
> > > bugs fixed above.  Both of these patches (#23 and #24) have received
> > > fixes since the 9/30 posting.
> > > 
> > > The final patch adds my metadata checksum test program to the tests/
> > > directory, along with a new metadata_check target to run a quick
> > > check.  It includes substitute mount/umount commands for use with
> > > fuse2fs.
> > > 
> > > For fuse2fs, I think it'd be useful to reintroduce journal replay too.
> > > (Or cheat and call e2fsck -E journal_only...)  Also, fuse2fs doesn't
> > > yet know how to read or write ACLs yet.
> > > 
> > > I've tested these e2fsprogs changes against the -next branch as of a
> > > few days ago.  These days, I use a 2GB ramdisk and a 20T "disk" I
> > > constructed out of dm-snapshot to test in an x64 VM.
> > > 
> > > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
> > > 
> > > --D
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists