lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:00:48 +0100
From:	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
To:	fsdevel@...fs.com, xfs@....sgi.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: bio_add_page rw mode check by merge_bvec_fn

Hi all,

raid5_mergeable_bvec() (q->merge_bvec_fn) checks for the rw-type and
makes decisions based on that if the bio is mergable or not. But so far
this value is only initialized on calling submit_bio(), 
at least not by ext4 and xfs. I have not checked other file system so far.

Question 1: merge_bvec_fn is supposed to be removed, is is
still worth to fix the usage of merge_bvec_fn?

Question 2: If it is still supposed to be fixed, how do want to have 
it? So far I have two patches for xfs and ext4 to set the rw type 
directly there, but maybe bio_add_page should get an int rw_type 
parameter and set bio->bi_rw itself?



diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
index d488f80..4cddc15 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static int io_submit_init_bio(struct ext4_io_submit *io,
        bio->bi_bdev = bh->b_bdev;
        bio->bi_end_io = ext4_end_bio;
        bio->bi_private = ext4_get_io_end(io->io_end);
+       bio->bi_rw |= io->io_op;
        io->io_bio = bio;
        io->io_next_block = bh->b_blocknr;
        return 0;

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 71c8c9d..b48048f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ xfs_submit_ioend_bio(
 
 STATIC struct bio *
 xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(
-       struct buffer_head      *bh)
+       struct buffer_head      *bh,
+       struct writeback_control *wbc)
 {
        int                     nvecs = bio_get_nr_vecs(bh->b_bdev);
        struct bio              *bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nvecs);
@@ -409,6 +410,7 @@ xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(
        ASSERT(bio->bi_private == NULL);
        bio->bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
        bio->bi_bdev = bh->b_bdev;
+       bio->bi_rw |= (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL) ? WRITE_SYNC : WRITE;
        return bio;
 }
 
@@ -511,7 +513,8 @@ xfs_submit_ioend(
 
                        if (!bio) {
  retry:
-                               bio = xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(bh);
+                               bio = xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(bh, wbc);
+
                        } else if (bh->b_blocknr != lastblock + 1) {
                                xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
                                goto retry;



Thanks,
Bernd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ