lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:05:02 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andreas Gruenbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...bit.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
	jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] fs: make posix_acl_chmod more useful

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Christoph,
> 
> > +int
> > +posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	struct posix_acl *acl;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_op->set_acl)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> Symlinks never have get_acl callbacks, so I would remove the S_ISLNK() check here.

Yeah, will simplify it.  Same for the other places where we have both
checks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ