linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 36/74] libext2fs: detect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:39:38 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/74] libext2fs: detect

It looks like the subject line for this commit was truncated --- I
could try to make something up, but could you suggest something?

Thanks!!

				- Ted


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:22:20PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> If ext2fs_descriptor_block_loc2() is called with a meta_bg filesystem
> and group_block is not the normal value, the function will return the
> location of the backup group descriptor block in the next block group.
> Unfortunately, it fails to account for the possibility that the backup
> group contains a backup superblock but the regular superblock does
> not.  This is the case with block groups 48-49 on a meta_bg fs with 1k
> blocks; in this case, libext2fs will fail to open the filesystem.
> 
> Therefore, teach the function to adjust for superblocks in the backup
> group, if necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> ---
>  lib/ext2fs/openfs.c |   19 +++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c b/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
> index b2a8abb..92d9e40 100644
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/openfs.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ blk64_t ext2fs_descriptor_block_loc2(ext2_filsys fs, blk64_t group_block,
>  	bg = EXT2_DESC_PER_BLOCK(fs->super) * i;
>  	if (ext2fs_bg_has_super(fs, bg))
>  		has_super = 1;
> -	ret_blk = ext2fs_group_first_block2(fs, bg) + has_super;
> +	ret_blk = ext2fs_group_first_block2(fs, bg);
>  	/*
>  	 * If group_block is not the normal value, we're trying to use
>  	 * the backup group descriptors and superblock --- so use the
> @@ -57,10 +57,21 @@ blk64_t ext2fs_descriptor_block_loc2(ext2_filsys fs, blk64_t group_block,
>  	 * have the infrastructure in place to do that.
>  	 */
>  	if (group_block != fs->super->s_first_data_block &&
> -	    ((ret_blk + fs->super->s_blocks_per_group) <
> -	     ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)))
> +	    ((ret_blk + has_super + fs->super->s_blocks_per_group) <
> +	     ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super))) {
>  		ret_blk += fs->super->s_blocks_per_group;
> -	return ret_blk;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If we're going to jump forward a block group, make sure
> +		 * that we adjust has_super to account for the next group's
> +		 * backup superblock (or lack thereof).
> +		 */
> +		if (ext2fs_bg_has_super(fs, bg + 1))
> +			has_super = 1;
> +		else
> +			has_super = 0;
> +	}
> +	return ret_blk + has_super;
>  }
>  
>  blk_t ext2fs_descriptor_block_loc(ext2_filsys fs, blk_t group_block, dgrp_t i)
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html