lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:33:30 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/30] libext2fs: check inline_data in ext2fs_xattrs_read/write On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:45:02AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:38:26PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 05:57:56PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > > > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > > > > > > Now on kernel side we can enable inline data even without ext_attr. So > > > we need to adjust sanity check on ext2fs_xattrs_read/write to let we > > > access extended attribute when filesystem is create with '-O ^ext_attr, > > > inline_data'. > > > > Oops, I removed both of those checks in favor of looking for ext_attr or > > inline_data in ext2fs_xattrs_open(). Oh well, sorry about the > > miscommunication. > > Got it. I am happy to rebase against your latest patch. Just FYI, you might want to rebase against -next + the EA v5 patch that I sent out Saturday. --D > > Thanks, > - Zheng > > > > > --D > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com> > > > --- > > > lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c b/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c > > > index 09e13b2..e5e0fa9 100644 > > > --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c > > > +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c > > > @@ -469,9 +469,17 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_xattrs_write(struct ext2_xattr_handle *handle) > > > unsigned int i; > > > errcode_t err; > > > > > > - if (!EXT2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > - EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR)) > > > - return 0; > > > + /* > > > + * If inline_data is enabled, we don't check ext_attr because > > > + * inline_data needs to read/write extended attribute even > > > + * without ext_attr. > > > + */ > > > + if (!EXT2_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_INLINE_DATA)) { > > > + if (!EXT2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > + EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR)) > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > > > > i = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(handle->fs->super); > > > if (i < sizeof(*inode)) > > > @@ -684,9 +692,17 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_xattrs_read(struct ext2_xattr_handle *handle) > > > int i; > > > errcode_t err; > > > > > > - if (!EXT2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > - EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR)) > > > - return 0; > > > + /* > > > + * If inline_data is enabled, we don't check ext_attr because > > > + * inline_data needs to read/write extended attribute even > > > + * without ext_attr. > > > + */ > > > + if (!EXT2_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_INLINE_DATA)) { > > > + if (!EXT2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(handle->fs->super, > > > + EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR)) > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > > > > i = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(handle->fs->super); > > > if (i < sizeof(*inode)) > > > -- > > > 1.7.9.7 > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists