lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:55:08 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:	tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/49] e2fsck: zero errcode when checking inline data blocks

When checking inline data blocks, always zero pctx->errcode because
otherwise a previous error condition could leak through and "cause" a
fatal block iteration failure.  I found this by corrupting an xattr
block on an inline_data inode and fsck aborted when I tried to repair
it.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
---
 e2fsck/pass1.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index 11b3dde..641b3fb 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -2158,8 +2158,10 @@ static void check_blocks_extents(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
 static void check_blocks_inline_data(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
 				     struct process_block_struct *pb)
 {
-	if (!pb->is_dir)
+	if (!pb->is_dir) {
+		pctx->errcode = 0;
 		return;
+	}
 
 	pctx->errcode = ext2fs_add_dir_block2(ctx->fs->dblist, pb->ino, 0, 0);
 	if (pctx->errcode) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ