lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:19:25 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Lucas Nussbaum <lucas.nussbaum@...ia.fr>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Emmanuel Jeanvoine <emmanuel.jeanvoine@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: Extremely slow remounts with concurrent I/O

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> TL;DR: we experience long temporary hangs when doing multiple mount -o
> remount at the same time as other I/O on an ext4 filesystem.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> When starting hundreds of LXC containers simultaneously on a system, the
> boot of some containers was hanging. We tracked this down to an
> initscript's use of mount -o remount, which was hanging in D state.
> 
> We reproduced the problem outside of LXC, with the script available at
> [0]. That script initiates 1000 mount -o remount, and performs some
> writes using a big cp to the same filesystem during the remounts.
....
> Some other things we tried:
> 1) we tried to 'sync' after removing the files, and dropping the caches
> (as shown in the commented lines in [0]). That makes the problem disappear
> (or at least makes it less frequent). The overall script execution is
> actually faster with the post-rm sync and dropping caches than without
> them!
> 
> 2) We tried switching to the noop scheduler (instead of cfq). The problem
> could still be reproduced. A btrace dump with noop is available at [2].
> 
> 3) We tried with ext3 instead of ext4. The problem could never be
> reproduced.
> 
> 4) We tried on different machines, and we could reproduce the problem.
> However, on a machine with SSD drives, we were not able to reproduce the
> problem.
> 
> Any ideas?

If this really is caused by sync on ext4 being slow while there are
concurrent writers, then perhaps:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=139388721931428&w=2

is a possible fix...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ