linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: fix block bitmap initialization under sparse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:31:40 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:	tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix block bitmap initialization under sparse_super2

The ext4_bg_has_super() function doesn't know about the new rules for
where backup superblocks go on a sparse_super2 filesystem.  Therefore,
block bitmap initialization doesn't know that it shouldn't reserve
space for backups in groups that are never going to contain backups.
The result of this is e2fsck complaining about the block bitmap being
incorrect (fortunately not in a way that results in cross-linked
files), so fix the whole thing.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/ext4/ext4.h   |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index d53f29a..cc63651 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -715,16 +715,6 @@ static inline int test_root(ext4_group_t a, int b)
 	}
 }
 
-static int ext4_group_sparse(ext4_group_t group)
-{
-	if (group <= 1)
-		return 1;
-	if (!(group & 1))
-		return 0;
-	return (test_root(group, 7) || test_root(group, 5) ||
-		test_root(group, 3));
-}
-
 /**
  *	ext4_bg_has_super - number of blocks used by the superblock in group
  *	@sb: superblock for filesystem
@@ -735,11 +725,26 @@ static int ext4_group_sparse(ext4_group_t group)
  */
 int ext4_bg_has_super(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t group)
 {
-	if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
-				EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER) &&
-			!ext4_group_sparse(group))
+	struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
+
+	if (group == 0)
+		return 1;
+	if (EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER2)) {
+		if (group == le32_to_cpu(es->s_backup_bgs[0]) ||
+		    group == le32_to_cpu(es->s_backup_bgs[1]))
+			return 1;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	if ((group <= 1) || !EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
+					EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER))
+		return 1;
+	if (!(group & 1))
 		return 0;
-	return 1;
+	if (test_root(group, 3) || (test_root(group, 5)) ||
+	    test_root(group, 7))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static unsigned long ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta(struct super_block *sb,
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index f1c65dc..7fefcdf 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1159,7 +1159,8 @@ struct ext4_super_block {
 	__le32	s_usr_quota_inum;	/* inode for tracking user quota */
 	__le32	s_grp_quota_inum;	/* inode for tracking group quota */
 	__le32	s_overhead_clusters;	/* overhead blocks/clusters in fs */
-	__le32	s_reserved[108];	/* Padding to the end of the block */
+	__le32	s_backup_bgs[2];	/* groups with sparse_super2 SBs */
+	__le32	s_reserved[106];	/* Padding to the end of the block */
 	__le32	s_checksum;		/* crc32c(superblock) */
 };
 
@@ -1505,6 +1506,7 @@ static inline void ext4_clear_state_flags(struct ext4_inode_info *ei)
 #define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR		0x0008
 #define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_RESIZE_INODE	0x0010
 #define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_DIR_INDEX		0x0020
+#define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER2	0x0200
 
 #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_SPARSE_SUPER	0x0001
 #define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE	0x0002
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html