| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:52:06 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, dchinner@...hat.com CC: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Separate mailing list for xfstests On 5/14/14, 8:20 AM, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I am wondering whether you're open to the idea of creating separate > mailing list for xfstests. It is no longer xfs specific project and > even though you're still a maintainer of the project, other fs folks > are definitely interested in the development process, but not > everyone might be interested in receiving everything from the > xfs@....sgi.com list. > > To speak for myself I would like to help with review of xfstests > patches as well, but I rarely go through my xfs folder > unfortunately. > > linux-fsdevel might seem as a good candidate for it, but still I > think that it deserves a separate ML to point people to. > > What do you think ? That sounds pretty reasonable to me. We've always encouraged submissions to cc: the other relevant lists (i.e. linux-ext4 if it's an ext4-specific patch) and would probably still encourage that, but even from the other angle (keeping i.e. ext4-specific and btrfs-specific patches off the xfs list) this sounds like a good idea. -Eric > Thanks! > -Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists