linux-ext4 - Re: more resize breakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 00:29:35 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: more resize breakage

On 5/29/14, 12:27 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:22:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink.  When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
>>
>> But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,

<snip>

>> Sad face.  :(
> 
> D'oh!
> 
> /me wonders, is offline grow any better?

Yes, offline passed.

> Also I "extended" fsfuzz to corrupt only metadata blocks and made the
> kernel+e2fsck chew through all that crap.  The kernel survived, but e2fsck
> seemed to die either failing to allocate blocks to resurrect the journal (bad
> bbitmap) or because of that thing where calling block_iterate on an inline data
> file makes e2fsck abort.
> 
> So, uh, ... long live the patchbomb? :(

yeah.  Maybe I (you?) should try my testcase w/ your latest patchbomb.  ;)

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html