linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] ext4: change lru to round-robin in extent status tree shrinker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:14:02 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] ext4: change lru to round-robin in extent status
 tree shrinker

On Wed 03-09-14 16:00:39, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:31:22PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Also one question:
> > 
> > > -		if (ei == locked_ei || !write_trylock(&ei->i_es_lock)) {
> > > -			nr_skipped++;
> > > -			spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lock);
> > >  			__ext4_es_list_add(sbi, ei);
> > > +			if (spin_is_contended(&sbi->s_es_lock)) {
> > > +				spin_unlock(&sbi->s_es_lock);
> > > +				spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lock);
> > > +			}
> >   Why not cond_resched_lock(&sbi->s_es_lock)?
> 
> I didn't think we were allowed to reschedule or sleep while in
> shrinker context?
  I believe we are allowed to sleep in the shrinker if appropriate gfp
flags are set (__GFP_WAIT) and we enter extent cache shrinker only if
__GFP_FS is set which guarantees __GFP_WAIT.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html