| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:14:10 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: remove __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list to
solve scalability issue
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:05:25PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
...
> > As drop_transaction() doesn't happen frequently as __buffer_unlink(jh),
> > it should alleviate the lock contention a bit.
> Yes, drop_transaction() isn't really an issue. But when doing
> __buffer_unlink() during IO completion, making the checkpoint list lock
> per-transaction one won't help the contention for the common case where
> transactions are reasonably large.
Good point.
>
> I was thinking about it for a while. I was thinking about various clever
> solutions but in the end what I think would be the best is just
> to change __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() to bail out once it spots
> a transaction it cannot free. That will deal with the pointless scanning of
> checkpointing lists you are hitting with your workload, it will also do all
> the cleanup that is necessary for transactions to be eventually cleaned up
> from the journal without having to wait in log_do_checkpoint().
>
> Attached are two patches - lightly tested only. Can you try whether they
> fix the contention for you? Thanks!
Yes, it fixs the contention as expected. So, feel free to add:
Tested-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks.
--yliu
>
> Honza
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
> >From ee5a1b87e267a8ae8935952c3c6971fa6cc41c63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:25:20 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: Avoid pointless scanning of checkpoint lists
>
> Yuanhan has reported that when he is running fsync(2) heavy workload
> creating new files over ramdisk, significant amount of time is spent in
> __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() trying to clean old transactions
> (but they cannot be cleaned up because flusher hasn't yet checkpointed
> those buffers).
>
> Reduce the amount of scanning by stopping to scan the transaction list
> once we find a transaction that cannot be checkpointed. Note that this
> way of cleaning is still enough to keep freeing space in the journal
> after fully checkpointed transactions.
>
> Reported-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> index 7f34f4716165..e39b2d0e1079 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,6 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
> * Find all the written-back checkpoint buffers in the given list and
> * release them.
> *
> - * Called with the journal locked.
> * Called with j_list_lock held.
> * Returns number of buffers reaped (for debug)
> */
> @@ -498,12 +497,12 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> jh = next_jh;
> next_jh = jh->b_cpnext;
> ret = __try_to_free_cp_buf(jh);
> - if (ret) {
> - freed++;
> - if (ret == 2) {
> - *released = 1;
> - return freed;
> - }
> + if (!ret)
> + return freed;
> + freed++;
> + if (ret == 2) {
> + *released = 1;
> + return freed;
> }
> /*
> * This function only frees up some memory
> @@ -523,7 +522,6 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> *
> * Find all the written-back checkpoint buffers in the journal and release them.
> *
> - * Called with the journal locked.
> * Called with j_list_lock held.
> * Returns number of buffers reaped (for debug)
> */
> @@ -531,7 +529,8 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> int __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal)
> {
> transaction_t *transaction, *last_transaction, *next_transaction;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
> + int freed = 0;
> int released;
>
> transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;
> @@ -543,17 +542,21 @@ int __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal)
> do {
> transaction = next_transaction;
> next_transaction = transaction->t_cpnext;
> - ret += journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> + ret = journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> t_checkpoint_list, &released);
> /*
> * This function only frees up some memory if possible so we
> * dont have an obligation to finish processing. Bail out if
> * preemption requested:
> */
> - if (need_resched())
> + if (need_resched()) {
> + freed += ret;
> goto out;
> - if (released)
> + }
> + if (released) {
> + freed += ret;
> continue;
> + }
> /*
> * It is essential that we are as careful as in the case of
> * t_checkpoint_list with removing the buffer from the list as
> @@ -561,11 +564,12 @@ int __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal)
> */
> ret += journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> t_checkpoint_io_list, &released);
> - if (need_resched())
> + freed += ret;
> + if (need_resched() || !ret)
> goto out;
> } while (transaction != last_transaction);
> out:
> - return ret;
> + return freed;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> >From 8e17e25b044489429ef27433ee83066950a202b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:46:34 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] jbd2: Simplify calling convention around
> __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list
>
> __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() returns number of buffers it
> freed but noone was using the value so just stop doing that. This
> also allows for simplifying the calling convention for
> journal_clean_once_cp_list().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> include/linux/jbd2.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> index e39b2d0e1079..ef23d6f4a6a2 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> @@ -479,16 +479,15 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
> * release them.
> *
> * Called with j_list_lock held.
> - * Returns number of buffers reaped (for debug)
> + * Returns 1 if we freed the transaction, 0 otherwise.
> */
> -
> -static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> +static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh)
> {
> struct journal_head *last_jh;
> struct journal_head *next_jh = jh;
> - int ret, freed = 0;
> + int ret;
> + int freed = 0;
>
> - *released = 0;
> if (!jh)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -499,11 +498,9 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> ret = __try_to_free_cp_buf(jh);
> if (!ret)
> return freed;
> - freed++;
> - if (ret == 2) {
> - *released = 1;
> - return freed;
> - }
> + if (ret == 2)
> + return 1;
> + freed = 1;
> /*
> * This function only frees up some memory
> * if possible so we dont have an obligation
> @@ -523,53 +520,48 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, int *released)
> * Find all the written-back checkpoint buffers in the journal and release them.
> *
> * Called with j_list_lock held.
> - * Returns number of buffers reaped (for debug)
> */
> -
> -int __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal)
> +void __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal)
> {
> transaction_t *transaction, *last_transaction, *next_transaction;
> int ret;
> - int freed = 0;
> - int released;
>
> transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;
> if (!transaction)
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> last_transaction = transaction->t_cpprev;
> next_transaction = transaction;
> do {
> transaction = next_transaction;
> next_transaction = transaction->t_cpnext;
> - ret = journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> - t_checkpoint_list, &released);
> + ret = journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->t_checkpoint_list);
> /*
> * This function only frees up some memory if possible so we
> * dont have an obligation to finish processing. Bail out if
> * preemption requested:
> */
> - if (need_resched()) {
> - freed += ret;
> - goto out;
> - }
> - if (released) {
> - freed += ret;
> + if (need_resched())
> + return;
> + if (ret)
> continue;
> - }
> /*
> * It is essential that we are as careful as in the case of
> * t_checkpoint_list with removing the buffer from the list as
> * we can possibly see not yet submitted buffers on io_list
> */
> - ret += journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> - t_checkpoint_io_list, &released);
> - freed += ret;
> - if (need_resched() || !ret)
> - goto out;
> + ret = journal_clean_one_cp_list(transaction->
> + t_checkpoint_io_list);
> + if (need_resched())
> + return;
> + /*
> + * Stop scanning if we couldn't free the transaction. This
> + * avoids pointless scanning of transactions which still
> + * weren't checkpointed.
> + */
> + if (!ret)
> + return;
> } while (transaction != last_transaction);
> -out:
> - return freed;
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> index 0dae71e9971c..704b9a599b26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ void jbd2_update_log_tail(journal_t *journal, tid_t tid, unsigned long block);
> extern void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *);
>
> /* Checkpoint list management */
> -int __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal);
> +void __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal);
> int __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(struct journal_head *);
> void __jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint(struct journal_head *, transaction_t *);
>
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists