linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:26:24 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	xfs@....sgi.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.de>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
	jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode

On Sat 18-10-14 08:17:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   I don't see the 4-bytes per inode saving, what am I missing? Frankly, I
> > don't see a difference in readability but since you and Al agree on that I
> > concede to your taste :)
> 
> It's the removal of s_inode_fields that saves 4 bytes.
  But that was in the superblock, not in the inode...
								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html