lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:02:46 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Return the length of a hole from get_block

On Mon 13-07-15 11:26:15, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:16:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 03-07-15 11:15:11, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Currently, if ext4's get_block encounters a hole, it does not modify the
> > > buffer_head.  That's fine for many callers, but for DAX, it's useful to
> > > know how large the hole is.  XFS already returns the length of the hole,
> > > so this improvement should not confuse any callers.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > So I'm somewhat wondering: What is the reason of BH_Uptodate flag being
> > set? I can see the XFS sets it in some cases as well but the use of the
> > flag isn't really clear to me...
> 
> No clue.  I'm just following the documentation in buffer.c:
> 
>  * NOTE! All mapped/uptodate combinations are valid:
>  *
>  *      Mapped  Uptodate        Meaning
>  *
>  *      No      No              "unknown" - must do get_block()
>  *      No      Yes             "hole" - zero-filled
>  *      Yes     No              "allocated" - allocated on disk, not read in
>  *      Yes     Yes             "valid" - allocated and up-to-date in memory.

OK, but that speaks about buffer head attached to a page. get_block()
callback gets a temporary bh (at least in some cases) only so that it can
communicate result of block mapping. And BH_Uptodate should be set only if
data in the buffer is properly filled (which cannot be the case for
temporary bh which doesn't have *any* data) and it simply isn't the case
even for bh attached to a page because ext4 get_block() functions don't
touch bh->b_data at all. So I just wouldn't set BH_Uptodate in get_block()
at all..

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ