linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: add a line break for proc mb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:12:15 -0700
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Huaitong Han <huaitong.han@...el.com>, tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add a line break for proc mb_groups display

On Feb 3, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:38:33AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 11:32 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:30:32AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 10:13 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:19:06PM +0800, Huaitong Han wrote:
>>>>>> This patch adds a line break for proc mb_groups display.
>>>> 
>>>> Using 2 lines for output might break any existing users.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any?
>>> 
>>> It's a multiline file if you have more than one blockgroup; this just makes it
>>> so that you don't have to special-case BG 0.
>> 
>> And existing scripts might do that now and might fail
>> to do properly after this change.
> 
> Or they might have sed -e 's/]#0/]\n#0/g' in which case they won't be affected.

I suspect that any scripts which handled this in the past probably didn't
even notice and just missed the bg=0 line at the end of the header.  Users
looking at the output probably saw it line-wrapped by the terminal and
didn't notice either.

>>> IOW: mb_groups scripts already had to parse multiple lines, and most likely any
>>> script parsing it would inject a newline after the header.
>> 
>> I've no dog in this fight really.  I just wanted to make
>> it clear that this could cause existing scripts to fail.
>> 
>> proc output is supposed to be unchanging except maybe
>> adding new fields to existing lines.
>> 
>> Your choice.
> 
> Ted's, really.  I have no idea which scripts do with various per-fs /proc
> files.  Usually poking in mb_groups is only done as part of failure report data
> collection to see what's mucked up the fs this time.
> 
> Anyway, I'll defer to the maintainer. :)

I think it makes sense to accept the patch, since I doubt any scripts will be broken, and it is the "right thing to do" rather than perpetuate a bug.

Cheers, Andreas






Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)