lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 16:36:50 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs@...il.com> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: e2fsprogs-1.43 make check failures When building e2fsprogs we normally ask users to run 'make check'. For e2fsprogs-1.42.13 we had '153 tests succeeded, 0 tests failed', but for version 1.43, we have '62 tests succeeded, 265 tests failed'. Many of the failures look like: $ cat f_lpffile.failed --- ../../tests/f_lpffile/expect.1 2009-08-13 01:39:58.000000000 +0000 +++ f_lpffile.1.log 2016-05-28 19:40:20.364025801 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +e2fsck 1.43 (17-May-2016) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity --- ../../tests/f_lpffile/expect.2 2009-08-13 01:39:58.000000000 +0000 +++ f_lpffile.2.log 2016-05-28 19:40:20.367025703 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +e2fsck 1.43 (17-May-2016) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity In fact running: [ /sources/e2fsprogs-1.43/build/tests ]$ grep ^+ *.failed|grep -v 1.43|grep -v @@|grep -v +++ gives no output. My conclusion is that all the tests actually pass, but the expected results need to be updated in the release tarball. -- Bruce Dubbs linuxfromscratch.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists