linux-ext4 - ext4, f2fs: fscrypt_has_permitted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:24:35 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ext4, f2fs: fscrypt_has_permitted_context() check in file open

Hi!

Both ext4 and f2fs check in the file open code the context of the parent directory too:

ext4:
        if (ext4_encrypted_inode(d_inode(dir)) &&
                        !fscrypt_has_permitted_context(d_inode(dir), inode)) {
                ext4_warning(inode->i_sb,
                             "Inconsistent encryption contexts: %lu/%lu",
                             (unsigned long) d_inode(dir)->i_ino,
                             (unsigned long) inode->i_ino);
                dput(dir);
                return -EPERM;
        }

f2fs:
        if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(d_inode(dir)) &&
                        !fscrypt_has_permitted_context(d_inode(dir), inode)) {
                dput(dir);
                return -EPERM;
        }

Why do we need this check? AFAIK this situation can never happen unless due to
a bug in the filesystem code.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html