linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 07 Apr 2017 08:15:24 +1000
From:   NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it

On Thu, Apr 06 2017, Jeff Layton wrote:

>
> I tried to avoid updating things unnecesssarily. I could use some
> guidance on how to specify the constants in terms of MAX_ERRNO as well.

ilog2() defined in include/linux/log2.h

And you have MAX_ERROR in one comment, instead of MAX_ERRNO :-)

>  
> -  flush: called by the close(2) system call to flush a file
> +  flush: called by the close(2) system call to flush a file. Writeback
> +	errors not previously reported via fsync should be reported
> +	here as you would for fsync.

"could", not "should".  I think it is agreed that this is a good
idea, is it?

> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 7251f7bb45e8..f33857113ff4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct address_space {
>  	gfp_t			gfp_mask;	/* implicit gfp mask for allocations */
>  	struct list_head	private_list;	/* ditto */
>  	void			*private_data;	/* ditto */
> +	u32			wb_err;

I would rather this was a wb_err_t or similar, and that the functions
which implement it take a pointer to a wb_err_t.
Then the 'error' in 'struct nfs_open_context' could become a 'wb_err_t',
and nfs could use these functions to do error tracking the way it wants
to.

Thanks - looking good.

NeilBrown

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)