lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2017 21:12:40 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: fscrypt: update mailing list, patchwork, and
 git

Eric,

Am 27.04.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:37:18AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> +FSCRYPT: FILE SYSTEM LEVEL ENCRYPTION SUPPORT
>>>  M:     Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
>>>  M:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>
>> IMHO we should also add such an entry, to match reality:
>>
>> R:      Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>>
> 
> Well, we could, but IMO it's a little pointless since there's now a dedicated
> mailing list, so there's no need to Cc me separately from the list.  I think
> explicitly listing reviewer(s) is more useful for subsystems that don't have a
> dedicated mailing list.

It depends on your workflow.
i.e. my mail filters give mails that go directly to me a much higher priority.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ