linux-ext4 - Re: lseek SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA fixes and switch to iomap V3.2-hch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:11:44 +0200
From:   Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lseek SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA fixes and switch to iomap V3.2-hch

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:47:51AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:54:15AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > Here is my take on all the current seek work.  It has my XFS quota changes
>>
>> I think the quota change patch fell out of this series, but I can grab
>> it from the previous iteration if it hasn't changed.
>
> It hasn't, please do.

We haven't heard from the ext4 folks on this yet: is everyone happy
with the vfs changes in this series at least? Can those be merged
through the xfs tree? That would allow us to move ahead on the gfs2
side.

Thanks,
Andreas