linux-ext4 - [Bug 196405] mkdir mishandles st_nlink in ext4 directory with 64997 subdirectories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:05:59 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...nel.org
Subject: [Bug 196405] mkdir mishandles st_nlink in ext4 directory with 64997
 subdirectories

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196405

--- Comment #27 from Paul Eggert (eggert@...ucla.edu) ---
(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #22)
> Paul is asserting that there is vast
> amount of breakage because ext4 can return an st_nlinks value of 1 on a
> directory, to the extent that he believes we should withdrawing the
> dir_nlinks feature.

I think this gets my most recent proposal backwards. At the end of Comment 17,
I proposed that the ext4 code act as if dir_nlink is always set. That's what
the code has been doing for a decade anyway. All that's missing is
documentation which says "the dir_nlink setting is irrelevant, and the file
system always acts as if dir_nlink is set", or words to that effect.

Although in hindsight perhaps the dir_nlink flag should have been implemented
properly, it wasn't and there's little point to implementing it properly now:
every application using ext4 must work with the current behavior anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.