lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:31:38 +0000
From:   Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
CC:     "jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>, "tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ext4: release discard bio after sending discard
 commands


> > We've changed the discard command handling into parallel manner.
> > But, in this change, I forgot decreasing the usage count of the bio
> > which was used to send discard request. I'm sorry about that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
> > Fixes: a015434480dc ("ext4: send parallel discards on commit
> > completions")
 
> Why do you think this is needed? submit_bio_wait() consumes the reference
> that you've got from __blkdev_issue_discard()...
>  
>                                                                Honza

Hi Jan,

I thought like you, but submit_bio_wait() doesn't consume the reference
of the bio and the bio cannot be released after the I/O has been completed.
The caller of submit_bio_wait() should invoke bio_put() in person.
You can see what we have to do after calling submit_bio_wait() in
fs/crypto/bio.c.

Actually, in our device, I can see that the slab memory grows gradually
because of the unreleased discard bios.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists