lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 13:34:34 +0300 From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> Cc: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: xattr hash error in 4.13-rc with overlayfs over ext4 On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com> wrote: >> Still no luck reproducing the error. I am using the test script below >> at v4.13-rc2. Do you mind checking my script to see what I am missing? > > Don't know. I can reliably reproduce it under UML, but not with a > VM. What the hell is going on? > Is it the same ext4 image for UML and VM? same image size? same mkfs version? What inode size do you have in UML setup? e.g.: dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda3|grep Inode.size dumpe2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) Inode size: 256 have extra_isize feature? (not sure if that matters) dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda3|grep isize dumpe2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Required extra isize: 28 Desired extra isize: 28
Powered by blists - more mailing lists