lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  7 Aug 2017 12:56:51 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc:     Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>,
        Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix clang build regression

As Stefan pointed out, I misremembered what clang can do specifically,
and it turns out that the variable-length array at the end of the
structure did not work (a flexible array would have worked here
but not solved the problem):

fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2303:17: error: fields must have a constant size:
'variable length array in structure' extension will never be supported
                ext4_grpblk_t counters[blocksize_bits + 2];

This reverts part of my previous patch, using a fixed-size array
again, but keeping the check for the array overflow.

Fixes: 2df2c3402fc8 ("ext4: fix warning about stack corruption")
Reported-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 5a1052627a81..701085620cd8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_seq_groups_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 					     EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE);
 	struct sg {
 		struct ext4_group_info info;
-		ext4_grpblk_t counters[blocksize_bits + 2];
+		ext4_grpblk_t counters[EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE + 2];
 	} sg;
 
 	group--;
@@ -2309,6 +2309,9 @@ static int ext4_mb_seq_groups_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			      " 2^0   2^1   2^2   2^3   2^4   2^5   2^6  "
 			      " 2^7   2^8   2^9   2^10  2^11  2^12  2^13  ]\n");
 
+	i = (blocksize_bits + 2) * sizeof(sg.info.bb_counters[0]) +
+		sizeof(struct ext4_group_info);
+
 	grinfo = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
 	/* Load the group info in memory only if not already loaded. */
 	if (unlikely(EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(grinfo))) {
@@ -2320,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_seq_groups_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 		buddy_loaded = 1;
 	}
 
-	memcpy(&sg, ext4_get_group_info(sb, group), sizeof(sg));
+	memcpy(&sg, ext4_get_group_info(sb, group), i);
 
 	if (buddy_loaded)
 		ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
-- 
2.9.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists