lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:30:48 +0200 From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: introduce per-inode DAX flag On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:00:19AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Bringing this discussion back to the "ext4: introduce per-inode DAX > flag" patch, it sounds to me that I should _not_ apply this patch > until we figure out to fix this for reals. Does this sound fair? > > If we think it's completely unfixable, then maybe XFS should consider > (temporarily) withdrawing the per-file DAX support before there is a > userspace and you have to support it forever, but that's between the > NVM/dax and XFS folks to figure out. > > - Ted Hi Ted, I agree, this still has some issues even for ext4. Let's see what we can do about that and I'll revisit it later. Thanks! -Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists