linux-ext4 - [PATCH 8/9] ext4: add sanity check for encryption + DAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:35:40 -0600
From:   Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/9] ext4: add sanity check for encryption + DAX

We prevent DAX from being used on inodes which are using ext4's built in
encryption via a check in ext4_should_use_dax().  We do have what appears
to be an unsafe transition of S_DAX in ext4_set_context(), though, where
S_DAX can get disabled without us doing a proper writeback + invalidate.

I actually think we are safe in this case because of the following:

1) You can't encrypt an existing file.  Encryption can only be set on an
empty directory, with new inodes in that directory being created with
encryption turned on, so I don't think it's possible to turn encryption on
for a file that has open DAX mmaps or outstanding I/Os.

2) There is no way to turn encryption off on a given file.  Once an inode
is encrypted, it stays encrypted for the life of that inode, so we don't
have to worry about the case where we turn encryption off and S_DAX
suddenly turns on.

3) The only way we end up in ext4_set_context() to turn on encryption is
when we are creating a new file in the encrypted directory.  This happens
as part of ext4_create() before the inode has been allowed to do any I/O.
Here's the call tree:

 ext4_create()
   __ext4_new_inode()
	 ext4_set_inode_flags() // sets S_DAX
	 fscrypt_inherit_context()
		fscrypt_get_encryption_info();
		ext4_set_context() // sets EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT, clears S_DAX

So, I actually think it's safe to transition S_DAX in ext4_set_context()
without any locking, writebacks or invalidations.  I've added a
WARN_ON_ONCE() sanity check to make sure that we are notified if we ever
encounter a case where we are encrypting an inode that already has data,
in which case we need to add code to safely transition S_DAX.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index d549dfb..6604a18 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1159,6 +1159,9 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
 	if (inode->i_ino == EXT4_ROOT_INO)
 		return -EPERM;

+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode) && i_size_read(inode)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	res = ext4_convert_inline_data(inode);
 	if (res)
 		return res;
-- 
2.9.5