linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: Switch to iomap for SEEK_HOLE / SEEK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:14:31 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Andreas Grünbacher 
        <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ext4: Switch to iomap for SEEK_HOLE / SEEK_DATA

On Thu 14-09-17 14:47:28, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2017-09-14 14:02 GMT+02:00 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>:
> > On Thu 14-09-17 11:50:47, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> @@ -3422,9 +3422,38 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> >>       map.m_lblk = first_block;
> >>       map.m_len = last_block - first_block + 1;
> >>
> >> -     if (!(flags & IOMAP_WRITE)) {
> >> +     if (flags & IOMAP_REPORT) {
> >>               ret = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
> >> -     } else {
> >> +             if (ret < 0)
> >> +                     return ret;
> >> +
> >> +             if (ret == 0) {
> >> +                     ext4_lblk_t end = map.m_lblk + map.m_len - 1;
> >> +                     struct extent_status es;
> >> +
> >> +                     ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range(inode, map.m_lblk, end, &es);
> >> +
> >> +                     if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) {
> >> +                             /* entire range is a hole */
> >> +                     } else if (es.es_lblk > map.m_lblk) {
> >> +                             /* range starts with a hole */
> >> +                             map.m_len = es.es_lblk - map.m_lblk;
> >> +                     } else {
> >> +                             ext4_lblk_t offs = 0;
> >> +
> >> +                             if (es.es_lblk < map.m_lblk)
> >> +                                     offs = map.m_lblk - es.es_lblk;
> >> +                             map.m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offs;
> >> +                             map.m_pblk = ext4_es_pblock(&es) + offs;
> >> +                             map.m_len = es.es_len - offs;
> >> +                             if (ext4_es_is_unwritten(&es))
> >> +                                     map.m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN;
> >
> > This is not possible. If there is unwritten extent at map->m_lblk, then
> > ext4_map_blocks() could not have possibly returned 0. So just delete this
> > condition and set map.m_pblk to 0 since delalloc extent has no physical
> > position.
> >
> >> +                             if (ext4_es_is_delayed(&es))
> >> +                                     delalloc = true;
> >
> > Also ext4_es_is_delayed(&es) is guaranteed to be true since you've looked
> > it up by ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range(). So just set delalloc = true
> > unconditionally.
> 
> Since map.m_pblk is never used in the delalloc case, we can leave it
> undefined above as well.

Yeah, that's fine by me as well.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR