linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: report collisions between directio and buffered writes to userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:37:53 -0800
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        holger@...lied-asynchrony.com,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iomap: report collisions between directio and
 buffered writes to userspace

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:27:49AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:51:00PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:26:06AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:18:29AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:39:25AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > > If two programs simultaneously try to write to the same part of a file
> > > > > via direct IO and buffered IO, there's a chance that the post-diowrite
> > > > > pagecache invalidation will fail on the dirty page.  When this happens,
> > > > > the dio write succeeded, which means that the page cache is no longer
> > > > > coherent with the disk!
> > > > 
> > > > This seems like a good opportunity to talk about what I've been working
> > > > on for solving this problem.  The XArray is going to introduce a set
> > > > of entries which can be stored to locations in the page cache that I'm
> > > > calling 'wait entries'.
> > > 
> > > What's this XArray thing you speak of?
> > 
> > Ah, right, you were on sabbatical at LSFMM this year where I talked
> > about it.  Briefly, it's a new API for the radix tree.  The data structure
> > is essentially unchanged (minor enhancements), but I'm rationalising
> > existing functionality and adding new abilities.  And getting rid of
> > misfeatures like the preload API and implicit GFP flags.
> > 
> > My current working tree is here:
> > 
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/shortlog/refs/heads/xarray-2017-11-20
> 
> First thing I noticed was that "xa" as a prefix is already quite
> widely used in XFS - it's shorthand for "XFS AIL". Indeed, xa_lock
> already exists and is quite widely used, so having a generic
> interface using the same prefixes and lock names is going to be
> quite confusing in the XFS code. Especially considering there's
> fair bit of radix tree use in XFS (e.g. the internal inode and
> dquot caches).
> 
> FYI, from fs/xfs/xfs_trans_priv.h:
> 
> /*
>  * Private AIL structures.
>  *
>  * Eventually we need to drive the locking in here as well.
>  */
> struct xfs_ail {
>         struct xfs_mount        *xa_mount;
>         struct task_struct      *xa_task;
>         struct list_head        xa_ail;
>         xfs_lsn_t               xa_target;
>         xfs_lsn_t               xa_target_prev;
>         struct list_head        xa_cursors;
>         spinlock_t              xa_lock;
>         xfs_lsn_t               xa_last_pushed_lsn;
>         int                     xa_log_flush;
>         struct list_head        xa_buf_list;
>         wait_queue_head_t       xa_empty;
> };
> 
> 
> > Ignoring the prep patches, the excitement is all to be found with the
> > commits which start 'xarray:'
> 
> FWIW, why is it named "XArray"?  "X" stands for what?  It still
> looks like a tree structure to me, but without a design doc I'm a
> bit lost to how it differs to the radix tree (apart from the API)
> and why it's considered an "array".

/me nominates 'xarr' for the prefix because pirates. :P

--D

> > If you want an example of it in use, I'm pretty happy with this patch
> > that switches the brd driver entirely from the radix tree API to the
> > xarray API:
> > 
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/commitdiff/dbf96ae943e43563cbbaa26e21b656b6fe8f4b0f
> 
> Looks pretty neat, but I'll reserve judgement for when I see the
> conversion of the XFS radix tree code....
> 
> > I've been pretty liberal with the kernel-doc, but I haven't written out
> > a good .rst file to give an overview of how to use it.
> 
> Let me know when you've written it :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@...morbit.com