lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:29:22 -0500 From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 12:53 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ack. Should I expect this in a future pull request, or take it directly? > > There's no hurry about this, since none of the existing users of that > function actually do anything but test the return value against zero, > and nobody saves it into anything but a "bool" (which has magical > casting properties and does not lose upper bits). > > Linus Do you mind just taking it directly? I don't have anything else queued up for this cycle. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists