lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 11:35:31 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
Cc:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
        Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4/309: Add SEEK_DATA tests for offsets in the middle
 of holes

On Fri 11-05-18 09:29:40, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 06:51:32PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > > ext4 had a bug for files with indirect extents where it wrongly reported
> > > a size of a hole in some cases and thus SEEK_DATA implementation could
> > > skip some data in a file. Test for that. The problem is fixed by patch
> > > "ext4: Fix hole length detection in ext4_ind_map_blocks()".
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > > ---
> > >  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/ext4/309         | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/ext4/309.out     |  1 +
> > >  tests/ext4/group       |  1 +
> > >  4 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100755 tests/ext4/309
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/ext4/309.out
> > >
> > > Note that I'm adding new tests to a common test program src/seek_sanity_test
> > > but I only use them from ext4 specific test as the offsets are pretty ext4
> > > specific and so I don't see any use in making this run for all other
> > > filesystems. If people think it should be done differently, please speak up.
> > 
> > I think its a very quick test and it deserves to be in generic.
> > Even thought the numbers are computed for ext4, the test is generic
> > enough to run on all fs.
> 
> Agreed.

OK, will do.


> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/ext4/309
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# FS QA Test No. 309
> > > +#
> > > +# SEEK_DATA sanity tests.
> > 
> > Please mention this is a regression test for ext4 bug fix
> > with commit id.
> 
> And it'd be good to have some more descriptive information on what the
> test actually exercises here.

OK, I'll improve that.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ