linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ext4: super: extend timestamps to 40 bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:55:07 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sirmy15@...il.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, tgnottingham@...il.com,
        y2038@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ext4: super: extend timestamps to 40 bits

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The inode timestamps use 34 bits in ext4, but the various timestamps in
> the superblock are limited to 32 bits. If every user accesses these as
> 'unsigned', then this is good until year 2106, but it seems better to
> extend this a bit further in the process of removing the deprecated
> get_seconds() function.
> 
> This adds another byte for each timestamp in the superblock, making
> them long enough to store timestamps beyond what is in the inodes,
> which seems good enough here (in ocfs2, they are already 64-bit wide,
> which is appropriate for a new layout).
> 
> I did not modify e2fsprogs, which obviously needs the same change to
> actually interpret future timestamps correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Thanks, applied.

					- Ted