linux-ext4 - [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:08:44 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685

--- Comment #90 from Hao Wei Tee (angelsl@...4.sg) ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #87)
> Maybe one day someone will become truly invested in the kernel development
> process and we'll have proper QA/QC/unit testing/regression
> testing/fuzzying

What we have now is not proper? syzkaller bot, Linux Test Project,
kernelci.org, xfstests, and more that I don't know of. Probably more than any
other OS.

I think it's fair to say Linux has by far more configuration options than any
other kernel out there. It's not feasible to test every single possible
combination. Things will slip through the cracks, especially bugs like this one
where clearly there is something wrong, but not everyone is able to reproduce
it at all. Automated tests are going to miss bugs like this.

We're not doing things worse than anyone else. Apple's APFS had major issues.
Microsoft just had a big problem with their Windows 10 1809 rollout.

Anyway, I remember you from another post you made to LKML complaining about
Linux. You really don't like the way Linux is developed. Why do you still use
it?

I digress.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.