linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: Prevent ext4_kvmalloc re-entring the filesystem and deadlocking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:10:08 +0900
From:   Naoto Kobayashi <naoto.kobayashi4c@...il.com>
To:     tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc:     Naoto Kobayashi <naoto.kobayashi4c@...il.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Prevent ext4_kvmalloc re-entring the filesystem and deadlocking

Although __vmalloc() doesn't support GFP_NOFS[1],
ext4_kvmalloc/kvzalloc caller may be under GFP_NOFS context
(e.g. fs/ext4/resize.c::add_new_gdb). In such cases, the memory
reclaim can re-entr the filesystem and potentially deadlock.

To prevent the memory relcaim re-entring the filesystem,
use memalloc_nofs_save/restore that gets __vmalloc() to drop
__GFP_FS flag.

[1] linux-tree/Documentation/core-api/gfp-mask-fs-io.rst

Signed-off-by: Naoto Kobayashi <naoto.kobayashi4c@...il.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 46b6d5b150ac..4a3c9ee63a34 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
 #include <linux/unicode.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>

 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
@@ -204,13 +205,32 @@ void ext4_superblock_csum_set(struct super_block *sb)
 	es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
 }

+static inline void *ext4_vmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags, pgprot_t prot)
+{
+	unsigned int nofs_flag = 0;
+	void *ret;
+
+	/**
+	 * Although __vmalloc() doesn't support GFP_NOFS, we may be under
+	 * GFP_NOFS context here. Hence we need to use memalloc_nofs_save()
+	 * to prevent memory reclaim re-entring the filesystem here and
+	 * potentially deadlocking.
+	 */
+	if (!(flags & __GFP_FS))
+		nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save();
+	ret = __vmalloc(size, flags, prot);
+	if (!(flags & __GFP_FS))
+		memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void *ext4_kvmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	void *ret;

 	ret = kmalloc(size, flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!ret)
-		ret = __vmalloc(size, flags, PAGE_KERNEL);
+		ret = ext4_vmalloc(size, flags, PAGE_KERNEL);
 	return ret;
 }

@@ -220,7 +240,7 @@ void *ext4_kvzalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)

 	ret = kzalloc(size, flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!ret)
-		ret = __vmalloc(size, flags | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL);
+		ret = ext4_vmalloc(size, flags | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL);
 	return ret;
 }

--
2.16.5