lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:47:13 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, tytso@....edu,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block >
 INT_MAX

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:08:31PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> We better warn the fibmap user and not return a truncated and therefore
> an incorrect block map address if the bmap() returned block address
> is greater than INT_MAX (since user supplied integer pointer).
> 
> It's better to pr_warn() all user of ioctl_fibmap() and return a proper
> error code rather than silently letting a FS corruption happen if the
> user tries to fiddle around with the returned block map address.
> 
> We fix this by returning an error code of -ERANGE and returning 0 as the
> block mapping address in case if it is > INT_MAX.
> 
> Now iomap_bmap() could be called from either of these two paths.
> Either when a user is calling an ioctl_fibmap() interface to get
> the block mapping address or by some filesystem via use of bmap()
> internal kernel API.
> bmap() kernel API is well equipped with handling of u64 addresses.
> 
> WARN condition in iomap_bmap_actor() was mainly added to warn all
> the fibmap users. But now that we have directly added this warning
> for all fibmap users and also made sure to return 0 as block map address
> in case if addr > INT_MAX.
> So we can now remove this logic from iomap_bmap_actor().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Well, this changed quite a bit from the previous version, so I would
have dropped the Reviewed-by tags.

That being said this version still looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ