linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix log printing of ext4_mb_regular

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:34:52 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
        tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix log printing of ext4_mb_regular_allocator()



On 8/7/20 7:31 PM, brookxu wrote:
> Fix log printing of ext4_mb_regular_allocator()，it may be an
> unintentional behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
> ---
>   fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 5d4a1be..b0da525 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2324,15 +2324,14 @@ static int ext4_mb_good_group_nolock(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
>   		 * We've been searching too long. Let's try to allocate
>   		 * the best chunk we've found so far
>   		 */
> -
>   		ext4_mb_try_best_found(ac, &e4b);
>   		if (ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_FOUND) {
>   			/*
>   			 * Someone more lucky has already allocated it.
>   			 * The only thing we can do is just take first
>   			 * found block(s)
> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: someone won our chunk\n");
>   			 */
> +			mb_debug(sb, "EXT4-fs: someone won our chunk\n");

mb_debug() already adds "EXT4-fs" string. So we need not add that here.
but maybe we can add "sbi->s_mb_lost_chunks" in this msg, which may be
helpful debug msg if too many lost chunks.


>   			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0;
>   			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0;
>   			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
>