linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] mm: split vm_normal_pages for LRU and non-LRU handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 17:32:24 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, jgg@...dia.com
Cc:     rcampbell@...dia.com, willy@...radead.org, apopple@...dia.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, jglisse@...hat.com,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: split vm_normal_pages for LRU and non-LRU handling

On 01.03.22 17:30, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Am 2022-03-01 um 11:22 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
>>>>>    		if (PageReserved(page))
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>>>> index c31d04b46a5e..17d049311b78 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>>>> @@ -1614,7 +1614,7 @@ static int add_page_for_migration(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>>>>>    		goto out;
>>>>>    
>>>>>    	/* FOLL_DUMP to ignore special (like zero) pages */
>>>>> -	follflags = FOLL_GET | FOLL_DUMP;
>>>>> +	follflags = FOLL_GET | FOLL_DUMP | FOLL_LRU;
>>>>>    	page = follow_page(vma, addr, follflags);
>>>> Why wouldn't we want to dump DEVICE_COHERENT pages? This looks wrong.
>>> This function later calls isolate_lru_page, which is something you can't
>>> do with a device page.
>>>
>> Then, that code might require care instead. We most certainly don't want
>> to have random memory holes in a dump just because some anonymous memory
>> was migrated to DEVICE_COHERENT.
> I don't think this code is for core dumps. The call chain I see is
> 
> SYSCALL_DEFINE6(move_pages, ...) -> kernel_move_pages -> do_pages_move 
> -> add_page_for_migration
> 

Ah, sorry, I got mislead by FOLL_DUMP and thought we'd be in
get_dump_page() . As you said, nothing to do.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb