linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ext4: only allow test_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 17:18:34 +0000
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when
 supported

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 06:20:23PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> > +static int ext4_check_test_dummy_encryption(const struct fs_context *fc,
> > +					    struct super_block *sb)
> 
> Maybe the function name should match with other option checking, like
> ext4_check_test_dummy_encryption_consistency() similar to
> ext4_check_quota_consistency(). This makes it clear that both are residents of
> ext4_check_opt_consistency()
> 
> One can argue it makes the function name quite long. So I don't have hard
> objections anyways.
> 
> So either ways, feel free to add -
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>

I did consider that, but that name seemed too long, as you mentioned.

Thanks for the review!

- Eric