linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Set casefold/fscrypt dentry operations through sb->s_d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:24:23 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
	amir73il@...il.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Set casefold/fscrypt dentry operations through
 sb->s_d_op

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:13:11PM -0500, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> v6 of this patchset applying the comments from Eric and the suggestion from
> Christian. Thank you for your feedback.
> 
> Eric, since this is getting close to merging, how do you want to handle
> it? I will take patch 1 through my tree already, are you fine if I merge
> this through unicode or do you want to take it through fscrypt?
> 
> As usual, this survived fstests on ext4 and f2fs.

I think you should just take the whole series through the unicode tree.

If I understand correctly, this series is really about fixing things for
casefolding support, not fscrypt support, right?  There is a lot of interaction
between the two, but ultimately it's casefold that gets fixed.

- Eric