linux-ext4 - [RFC PATCH v4 12/34] ext4: don't set EXTENT_STATUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:29:26 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu,
	adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	jack@...e.cz,
	ritesh.list@...il.com,
	hch@...radead.org,
	djwong@...nel.org,
	david@...morbit.com,
	willy@...radead.org,
	zokeefe@...gle.com,
	yi.zhang@...wei.com,
	yi.zhang@...weicloud.com,
	chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
	yukuai3@...wei.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 12/34] ext4: don't set EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED on allocated blocks

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

Since we always set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE when allocating
delalloc blocks, no matter whether allocating delayed or non-delayed
allocated blocks. There is no need to keep delayed flag on unwritten
extent status entry, so just drop it after blocks have been allocated.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents_status.c |  9 +--------
 fs/ext4/inode.c          | 11 -----------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 2320b0d71001..952a38eaea0f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -867,14 +867,7 @@ void ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
 		return;
 
 	BUG_ON(end < lblk);
-
-	if ((status & EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED) &&
-	    (status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN)) {
-		ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, "Inserting extent [%u/%u] as "
-				" delayed and written which can potentially "
-				" cause data loss.", lblk, len);
-		WARN_ON(1);
-	}
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(status & EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED);
 
 	newes.es_lblk = lblk;
 	newes.es_len = len;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index fd5a27db62c0..752fc0555dc0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -558,12 +558,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 	status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
 			EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
-	if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) &&
-	    !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) &&
-	    ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk,
-			       map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1))
-		status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED;
-
 	ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len,
 			      map->m_pblk, status);
 
@@ -682,11 +676,6 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 		status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
 				EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
-		if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) &&
-		    !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) &&
-		    ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk,
-				       map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1))
-			status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED;
 		ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len,
 				      map->m_pblk, status);
 	}
-- 
2.39.2